Friday, April 5, 2013

A 'gray divorce' boom

from latimes


The Beatles sang 'Will you still need me, will you still feed me, when I'm 64?' When it comes to marriage, many baby boomers are saying 'no.'

  • Email
    Share
    619
"Gray divorce"
The rise in "gray divorce" is a product of dramatic changes in the meaning of marriage in America over the last half-century.(Harry Campbell / For The Times March 29, 2013)
Until recently, it would have been fair to say that older people simply did not get divorced. Fewer than 10% of those who got divorced in 1990 were ages 50 or older. Today, 1 in 4 people getting divorced is in this age group.
It turns out that those high-profile breakups of Tipper and Al Gore, and Maria Shriver and Arnold Schwarzenegger, were part of a trend. Baby boomers, who drove the huge increase in divorce that began during the 1970s and persisted through the early 1980s, are at it again. Just as they have transformed other arenas of U.S. social life, boomers are now reshaping the contours of divorce.
The rise in "gray divorce" is a product of dramatic changes in the meaning of marriage in America over the last half-century. Today, we live in an era of individualized marriage, in which those who wed have high expectations for marital success. Americans expect marriage to provide them not simply with stability and security but also with self-fulfillment and personal satisfaction. Roles are flexible; the traditional breadwinner-homemaker model is no longer the status quo. Good spouses engage in open communication and are best friends. This is a high bar for many to achieve, let alone maintain over decades while juggling work and child-rearing.
If a marriage is not achieving these goals, then divorce is an acceptable solution, according to most Americans. As Ann Landers famously advised those considering divorce, simply answer the question, "Are you better off with or without your spouse?"
For many boomers, the question is a familiar one because they have already gotten divorced, picked up the pieces and moved on. Boomers are more likely than previous generations to have experienced divorce and remarriage. And those remarriages, it turns out, are at greater risk of ending in divorce. In part, that's because these marriages tend to be more fragile due to the relationship challenges associated with forming a stepfamily. Remarriages are also less stable because they involve individuals who have demonstrated their willingness to get divorced in the event of an unsatisfactory marriage. A study I conducted with I-Fen Lin found that the divorce rate among married couples ages 50 and older was 2 1/2 times higher for those in remarriages than in first marriages.
The more complex marital biographies of many boomers thus have enduring consequences, potentially placing them at heightened risk of a later-life divorce. Another factor in the growing rate of late-life divorces includes an increased tendency of couples to reassess their unions at life turning points, such as an empty nest or retirement. Lengthening life expectancies can play a role too. Men and women who are 65 can expect to live 20 more years, a long time to spend with someone you may not like so much anymore.
The consequences of this gray divorce revolution are largely unknown. Because relatively few older adults divorced in the past, there is little research on the implications of later-life divorce for the well-being of individuals, their families and society at large.
Still, there are some things we can infer. When couples divorce in later life, there are fewer years ahead of them than behind, meaning that individuals have limited opportunities to make up for the financial losses often associated with divorce. Some will have to stay in jobs longer than they would have had they not divorced, or will try to reenter the labor force late in life. Those unable to prolongemployment may find themselves in unexpectedly straitened circumstances. For economically secure older adults in good health, a divorce may have minimal negative consequences and actually can be freeing and empowering, at least for the initiator of the divorce. But for less-advantaged older adults, a late-in-life divorce can be devastating.
Whether those who divorce later in life will try their luck again in the marriage market is unclear. Many will undoubtedly remain single, or pursue unmarried, cohabiting relationships that require less commitment and allow them to avoid the legal entanglements of marriage. One in three baby boomers is currently single, and these boomers are more vulnerable both economically and socially compared with married boomers. They are also in poorer health, raising questions about who will care for them as they transition into old age.
The Beatles, the icon of boomers around the globe, were prescient when they sang, "Will you still need me, will you still feed me, when I'm 64?" Increasingly, the answer is no, as more boomers are calling it quits, choosing to navigate midlife and old age alone.
Susan L. Brown is a professor of sociology and co-director of the National Center for Family and Marriage Research at Bowling Green State University.

Judge: Make 'morning-after pill' available to all girls without prescription

from nbcnews





Joe Raedle / Getty Images file
The judge's ruling would expand access to all brands of levonorgestrel-based emergency contraception, including those such as Plan B, to young girls.
A federal judge on Friday reversed a contentious Food and Drug Administration ruling and ordered the agency to make the so-called "morning-after pill" available without a prescription to all girls of reproductive age, including those younger than 17.
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Edward Korman in Brooklyn, New York, comes in a lawsuit brought by reproductive-rights groups that had sought to remove age and other restrictions on emergency contraception, as Reuters first reported.
Currently, only women aged 17 and or older can obtain emergency contraception without a prescription. That rule has been in place since December 2011, when Health and Human ServicesSecretary Kathleen Sebelius overruled an FDA recommendation -- and Commissioner Margaret Hamburg -- to force the agency to limit emergency contraception to young girls.

SURVEY

Q: What do you think of the judge's ruling?

Sebelius had said she wasn't convinced that Teva Pharmaceuticals Inc., the maker of Plan B One-Step, had proven that non-prescription use of emergency contraceptives containing the drug levonorgestrel should be broadened. She expressed concern that girls reaching reproductive maturity at age 11 -- or even younger -- could have access to the medication.
At the time, that decision drew intense criticism from medical and women's rights groups, who said that denying access defied strong scientific data that showed that emergency contraception is safe and effective for girls and women of all ages. 
In his ruling Friday, Korman said the FDA's rejection of requests to remove age restrictions to obtain the pill had been "arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable," Reuters reported.
The ruling would expand access to all brands of levonorgestrel-based emergency contraception, including those such as Plan B and Next Choice, to women of all ages. It lifts so-called "point of sale" restrictions and would allow drug companies to apply to make emergency contraception available to women of all ages at stores other than pharmacies.
Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, hailed the ruling. "Women all over the country will no longer face arbitrary delays and barriers just to get emergency contraception," she told Reuters.
The group was among those that brought the lawsuit. Northup and others planned a press call to answer questions about the ruling on Friday.
Meanwhile, news of the ruling was applauded by a range of women's rights and reproductive rights groups. 
“Lifting the age restrictions on over-the-counter emergency contraception is a significant and long-overdue step forward for women’s health that will benefit women of all ages," said Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federal of America, in a statement. 
The National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health said the ruling would benefit immigrant and young Latina women. 
"For too long, this important backup birth control method has been kept behind the counter and out of reach," the organization's leaders said in a statement. "Immigrant women and new Americans of all ages have been hit particularly hard since they are less likely to have government identification."
FDA spokeswoman Erica Jefferson declined to comment on the ruling, saying it was an ongoing legal matter.

Thursday, April 4, 2013

Obama praises Calif. AG's looks



We can't help but wonder what the first lady is going to think of this.
At a fundraiser Thursday in California, PresidentObama had nothing but praise for state Attorney General Kamala Harris -- including her looks.
"She's brilliant and she's dedicated, she's tough ... she also happens to be, by far, the best looking attorney general," Obama told donors.
As the crowd reacted, the president said: "It's true! C'mon!"