Thursday, August 22, 2013

After Sentencing, Manning Says, ‘I Am Female’

from nytimes



  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • GOOGLE+
  • SAVE
  • E-MAIL
  • SHARE
  • PRINT
  • REPRINTS
Pfc. Bradley Manning, the Army private who pleaded guilty to leaking government files to WikiLeaks and was sentenced on Wednesday to 35 years in military prison, said in a statement Thursday that “I am female” and wants to begin living life that way.

In a letter to supporters titled “The Next Stage of My Life,” Private Manning wrote, “I am Chelsea Manning. I am a female. Given the way that I feel, and have felt since childhood, I want to begin hormone therapy as soon as possible. I hope that you will support me in this transition.”
The letter went on to request that Private Manning’s supporters “refer to me by my new name and use the feminine pronoun (except in official mail to the confinement facility).” It was signed, “Chelsea Manning.”
Private Manning has described himself as gay in the past, and some of his supporters have described him as transgender. In an online chat conversation, published by the Web site of Wired magazine in 2010, Private Manning told the man who eventually turned him in to the authorities, Adrian Lamo, that “I wouldn’t mind going to prison for the rest of my life, or being executed so much, if it wasn’t for the possibility of having pictures of me plastered all over the world press as a boy.”
Private Manning’s apparent struggles with gender identity were invoked during by his defense team at his trial. A widely circulated photograph showed Private Manning wearing lipstick and a blonde wig; Manning had e-mailed the photo to an Army psychologist with the subject line, “My Problem.”
In an interview on the “Today” show on Thursday, Private Manning’s attorney, David Coombs, said his client waited to speak publicly about being a woman until after the sentencing.

Sunday, August 11, 2013

"I FOUND COMFORT IN ROUGH SEX. THEN THINGS REALLY GOT SCARY."

from elle

One woman's story on using sex as a coping mechanism

BY TRACY CLARK-FLORY JUNE 18, 2013


I vividly remember the patch of sidewalk that I was looking at when my dad said, “I’m afraid it’s bad news, honey.” I clutched my cell phone to my ear as he explained that a CT scan of my mom’s lungs had revealed a tumor wrapped around her esophagus and metastasis in her bones. I can still see the small dots in the cement—shades of gray in this decidedly black-and-white situation—as he explained that her prognosis was bleak: She had six months to a year. I also recall the green chain-link fence that I thought I might have to grab onto as a sense of vertigo took over, as though I might pass out from this too-sudden shift in reality.
Everything else in the moments and even months after that is a blur—everything except for the sex.
It started with "Sam," a 38-year-old waiter with leprechaunish looks. I wasn’t attracted to him, exactly, but he had an intriguingly dangerous, if corny, edge—what with his conspicuous flash of chest hair and wolf-tooth necklace. Already a few drinks deep, I met him in a local bar, and it took two more beers before I was straddling him in a shadowy pleather booth and he was shoving his hands down my pants.
At my place, he took the lead, gripping my face, wrists, or hair with his hands—I somehow just knew this was how he’d be. The harder he squeezed, pressed, or pulled, the louder I moaned. He got the message. Before long, Sam was flipping me over, repositioning my limbs, and dragging me across the carpet, as if I were a RealDoll. He seemed awed by my enthusiasm for being manhandled: “Are you kidding me? You’ve got to be kidding me,” he said breathlessly, as though he’d just won the kinky lottery.
I was in awe too: While I’d certainly seen far more extreme porn, and even had reported on BDSM as a journalist covering sex for an online magazine, I’d never so much as used fuzzy handcuffs before. My fantasies were sometimes off-color, but the most aggression I’d encountered in real life was a couple of de rigueur slaps on the rear. I vaguely knew my new desires were connected to my mom’s illness; I’d also chopped my long hair into an Aeon Flux—style bob—a superheroine, ready to fight evil—and started talking about getting a tattoo, an idea I’d always sneered at. It was as if I were casting off all the markers of myself, because who was I without my mother? Or rather, who was I to exist without her?
Sam left me with rug burns on my elbows and knees that scabbed over and months later became scars, but these were nothing compared to the grapefruit-size bruise on my butt. It was such a spectacular purple that I had to show it to one of my best friends: “Look at this,” I said, carefully pulling down my pants, trying to reveal only the mark. “Look at this.” It seemed a marvel of the human body, this firework of pigment right under my skin. She looked less impressed than concerned—and that was increasingly becoming the case with my friends. They just don’t get it, I thought: This isn’t self-annihilation, it’s affirmation.
I’d become fascinated with my body, in fact. After spending hours clicking through a digital copy of my mother’s CT scan, which revealed in startling detail all the precious organs that kept her alive, I’d stare at the veins in my own hands, imagining the blood passing through them, or I’d notice the thump of my heart and wonder that it hadn’t stopped yet.
My wounds were with me when I visited my mom in the hospital a few days after my session with Sam. She’d been rushed in for surgery because of a blood clot near her aorta, a complication of the cancer. She looked at me with wild, pleading eyes and in a stage whisper explained that doctors had secretly moved her from the original hospital to a locked psychiatric ward. I was terrified too—not because I believed her conspiracy theory, but because she sounded like she’d lost her mind. At that moment, I wasn’t sure if it was just the drugs she was on—what if the cancer had spread to her brain? What if my mom was already gone?
I turned to her and repeated the words she’d said to me so many times as I was growing up, after any embarrassment or disappointment: “It’s going to be okay. Everything’s going to be okay.”
Shortly thereafter, I met “Mike,” a smart and charismatic man with a drinking problem and a self-declared hero complex. I was drawn to him instantly. Grief is isolating, but with him I didn’t feel so alone. He seemed always to reek of whiskey—it was the smell of poison, or medicine, a sign that there was something in him that needed to be numbed. We’d met through a mutual friend and first hooked up while talking about my mom’s illness. “You must be having a hard time,” he said, stroking my hands, and then gestured for me to sit on his lap.
From the beginning he was forceful in bed, but in a way that seems to have become standard among guys of my millennial generation: jackhammer pounding with a little hair pulling. Just as with Sam, I urged him further. Soon he was taking me from behind while covering my mouth with his hand. He’d tug at my jaw or throat, using it for leverage, pulling my head up, up, up, like we were doing a pornographic yoga move. Although we never explicitly linked my mother’s condition to my appetite for pain, he must have known it played a role, yet he’d make confident proclamations like, “Girls love to be roughed up.”
When we were apart, it was as if he were still with me. I’d send him text-message updates, things like, “still purple” and “ribs are bruised.” Mike would apologize, but I wasn’t complaining, and he knew it. My sorrow was uncontainable, but bruises and scabs have clear edges and a short timetable for healing. I started to recognize that rough sex, which I was pursuing with other men during the same period, was a means of physically manifesting my interior pain, releasing it in a way that my tears couldn’t. It was a sexual version of cutting. So much of my grief was abstract—horror at an inevitable but still only imagined world without my mom—but there was nothing theoretical about the marks on my body. I looked as beat-up as I felt. It relieved my feelings and validated them, all at once.
At one point, I visited my parents’ house with a large scarf wrapped around a hand-shape bruise, and while part of me wanted my mom to catch a glimpse of the evidence of my pain, I mostly felt ashamed. Her arms were covered with sores from weekly poking and prodding at the cancer clinic, her belly a collection of bruises from daily injections in her stomach, and my body was scored because of what? Because of my inability to bear emotional pain, because of a frivolous overidentification with my mother’s suffering, because I was furious at how little control we have over life and death and was turning my rage inward.
Manhattan sex therapist and author Ian Kerner tells me that just as with eating, drinking, or shopping, “sex can quickly escalate into a way of self-medicating to deal with emotional unrest, whether it’s to avoid those emotions or, conversely, to confront them in a deeper, fuller way.” Defining what is healthy when it comes to such coping is complicated and often depends on “the duration of the behavior and to what extent it was situational or in danger of becoming chronic,” he says, and, crucially, whether it’s causing “personal or relationship distress.”
Undoubtedly unhealthy was the binge drinking I’d been doing, which typically accompanied the sex. I hit points that should’ve been rock bottom—such as when I woke up next to my own vomit, with only the fuzziest recollection of having drunkenly thrown up in my bed—but I managed to keep sinking lower.


Looking back at the time with my mom immediately after her diagnosis is almost like trying to see the sun: I can only catch a partial glimpse of what it was like. Even then, it felt like a surreal, out-of-body experience.
Not long after she was discharged from the hospital, I can remember curling up next to her in bed. She was asleep, moaning and mumbling. I wanted to wake her from what seemed to be a nightmare, but was reality any better? Awake, in her morphine haze, she formed sentences that were coherent but made no sense. “Harold is coming over for dinner,” she told me nonchalantly, referring to a family friend who’d died months before.
Later, when she got up to sort through the medicine bottles on her bedside table, I saw just how decimated she was. The flesh of her thighs appeared to hang from the bone, as though there were no muscle left. Without thinking about it, I sat up in bed and readied my arms in case she started to teeter, much like she must have done for me during the first years of my life. I’d never before felt the need to protect my mom.
I’m an only child, and my parents and I used to have a game when I was little: At the end of a dinner out, I’d whisper a code word to my dad that was the cue for us to leave the restaurant ahead of my mother. Then I’d hide nearby, and when she came out, he’d pretend he’d lost me. “What do you mean you lost her?” my mom would plead. “Oh no! Where’s my bunny?” At that, I’d emerge from the shadows with a leap, and she’d wrap me in a big hug: “There you are!” I adored this routine; though I didn’t grasp it then, of course, it was a game about the dangers of the world that served as reassurance that my mom would always look out for me.
She took care of other children, too. Our place was home base for my friends, some with absent or abusive parents, and my mom was always stocking the kitchen with snacks and inviting everyone to stay for dinner. She went so far as to take in a boyfriend of mine who’d dropped out of high school and was sleeping in his car amid serious family unrest; she helped him get his GED and enroll in college. My mother was never the cuddly type (her own strict upbringing had discouraged that), but her capacity for nurturing was huge.
It wasn’t just that the world felt safer with her in it—it also made more sense. We talked endlessly, especially when I was in college, about philosophy, literature, religion. This had always been the nature of our odd little trio. My parents and I were known at local restaurants as “the reading family,” because we’d each bring our own book to read, although we often as not began talking to one another instead. As I grew up, so did our conversations: In my teens and early twenties, it seemed no topic was off-limits. Berkeley liberals through and through, my parents not only talked openly about sex but rhapsodized about its spiritual, transcendent possibilities. As progressive as they were, how-ever, 
they seemed to make value judgments about “good” and “bad” sex. Although I firmly believed that people could happily and healthily engage in BDSM, I was sure that my parents would consider it harmful, even if consensual.
It was after Thanksgiving dinner, spent in my parents’ living room with a rented hospital bed acting as the proverbial elephant in the room, that I began to crave more violence. When I got home, I arranged to go to Mike’s and then sent a timid text: “Be rough with me?” He responded within seconds: “Done.”
I was asking him to take it to the next level, without knowing what exactly that meant. I didn’t have anything in particular in mind: I was more curious about how far he’d go. I already felt at the whim of an indifferent universe, with no choice about my mom’s illness. But giving Mike “permission” to do what he would with me was different. There was something comforting about surrendering to controlled chaos. As BDSM practitioners like to say, submission is about control: The “bottom” sets limits and calls the shots. I wasn’t following the rules of careful negotiation and boundary setting, but the principle held, to an extent.
As soon as I stepped into his bedroom, he pulled me down by my hair and slammed me against the side of the mattress. “Who’s in charge here? You think you’re in charge?”
I looked him in the eyes and coquettishly nodded, “Uh-huh.”
He lightly grazed my face with the tips of his fingers and I laughed, telling him to do it harder—and he did. It was the first time I’d ever been slapped in the face. It was a stunning trespass against my body—more than any other part of me, my face was me. The broad smack reminded me of the most sickening, inexcusable cases of domestic violence—and sexism, more generally—but I’d asked for it. From my feminist perspective, this was pretty transgressive—and it was thrilling, if not pleasurable.
Before we finished, he did it again, slapped my face three times in quick succession. It felt like Buddhist meditation with a twist of S&M: Smack-smack-smack. Be here now. There was just my skin and his hand, nothing more.
Afterward, while I was lying in the nook of his arm, he offered, “So, I’m guessing Thanksgiving was hard.” “Yeah,” I said with a wry laugh. “It was a reminder of how little time is left.” My throat closed up on the last few words, and as he traced the ridges of my ear with his finger, I hoped he didn’t feel the tears falling onto his chest.
Mike tried to rescue me by satisfying my need for more—but all the time he worried that it was too much. Once, he grabbed my face, looked me straight on, and said with concern: “Wait. Is this okay?”
“Yes, it’s okay,” I replied, exasperated. I didn’t want to think—about what it meant, about whether it truly was okay—I just wanted to feel. “It’s exactly what I want.”
Nonetheless, after seeing him I often left feeling used, abused, and alone. He was a notorious cad, but I harbored the pathetic hope that I’d be the one to change him. I’d shown him the depths of my pain, but it made no difference. That, it seemed, reinforced the cruelty of the world, the irrelevance of my grief. The feeling was amplified by my concurrent exploits with other men: I sought out guys who seemed like they’d be into getting rough (and I was rarely wrong), but, paradoxically, their willingness to go there felt like an insult.
Even as my mom rebounded from her initial decline, I found it difficult to celebrate her improvement rather than mourn what was gone. Radiation shrank some of her tumors and eased her pain so that she didn’t require as much morphine, which meant that she was more like her usual, coherent self—only she still lacked much of an attention span. My exceedingly literate mother, who wrote her master’s thesis on the romantics and read Wordsworth at her wedding, had enough concentration only for TV—specifically, The Real Housewives andCupcake Wars. We spent hours watching catty socialites hurl insults and overturn tables, and bakers build improbable, motorized layer cakes.
One afternoon, as she threw up from the chemo, she apologized, “Honey, I’m sorry.”
I was incredulous: “Mom, how many times have you watched me throw up? I’ve thrown up on you.”
She tilted her head and smiled: “Yes, but not in a very long time, sweetie.”
I realized it needed to stop after I typed out a matter-of-fact text message to send to Mike: “Will you punch me in the face?”
My dad was driving me home from a visit with my mom when he started to cry. “I just love her so much,” he said, tears bouncing off his round cheeks and landing in his graying mountain-man beard. “I can’t imagine my life without her.” It was an unusual moment of open despair—usually he teared up telling me how lucky he felt just to have had such a love, even though he was losing her. The thought that came to my mind was, My dad’s losing his life, too. His world was being taken from him. I greeted this apocalyptic idea by asking to be punched in the face.
I stared at the words and the blinking cursor that followed, which seemed synced with my heartbeat. Then my thumb went directly to the backspace button: Delete, delete, delete. I held down the button long after the message was gone.
With one sentence, I’d managed to finally reveal the depth of my anguish to myself. I might as well have asked him to take a razor blade to my wrist. No one would ever be able to hurt me enough, I realized. No amount of physical pain could trump my emotional agony; no number of healed bruises or scabs could erase my sorrow. In contrast to my father’s great, big aching love for my mother, my nihilistic impulse seemed especially ugly—and foolish.
The rough sex didn’t stop immediately; life rarely moves in such a straight line. But as I began to see these trysts for what they were, they increasingly lost their allure. At the same time, I started to appreciate what a blessing it was that my mom was responding to treatment and that I could be with her in these final months. I actually believed my roommate when she told me how lucky I was: “My mom could live to be 100,” she said, “but I’ll still never have the relationship you’ve had with yours.”
My mom has outlasted her doctors’ prognosis by three years, but she still has cancer, she is still dying, and I’m still preemptively grieving. The difference now is that instead of treating myself harshly, trying to destroy, I want to follow the advice she gives me at the end of nearly every one of our visits: “Take care of yourself, honey.”

Bernie Madoff Sex Den Alleged

from abc

GTY bernie madoff jt 130810 16x9 608 Bernie Madoff Sex Den Alleged


Bernard Madoff’s investment firm was not only a criminal operation, according to federal prosecutors, it was a sex den featuring multiple romantic entanglements among employees, clients and even the convicted Ponzi schemer himself.
“The government’s investigation has revealed that, over the course of the multi-decade fraud … a number of Madoff Securities employees and customers … were engaged in romantic or sexual relationships,” Justice Department prosecutors wrote in a motion filed in Manhattan federal court this week. “For example, one of the defendants was in a love triangle with Bernard Madoff himself.”
The document was filed as part of an effort by the feds to keep the salacious information from being introduced when Madoff’s former secretary, Annette Bongiorno, and others face trial in the fall on charges of securities fraud and conspiracy. Prosecutors told the court they anticipate lawyers for Bongiorno and her co-defendants would attempt to use the sex secrets to damage the credibility of witnesses the feds plan to call. They then called on the judge to issue “an order excluding any such evidence – by either side.”
But the otherwise-antiseptic filing caught the defendants and their lawyers by surprise, they told ABC News Friday.
“My client does not know what the government refers to when it refers to romantic entanglements,” said Bongiorno’s attorney, Roland Riopelle. “I don’t know anything about what the government thinks it knows.”
Questions about the romantic references occupied a portion of a pretrial hearing Friday and lawyers for both sides eventually agreed to talk privately about the extracurricular escapades that were allegedly occurring as Madoff ran his $65 billion Ponzi scheme, bilking investors around the world.
After defense lawyers get the R-rated details from prosecutors, they will decide whether to use the embarrassing info at Bongiorno’s trial, likely to in October.
Madoff, founder of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC and a former chairman of the Nasdaq, is serving a 150-year federal prison term.

Sunday, July 28, 2013

Blocking Porn At The Google Or Search Engine Level Won't Work

from forbes

Tim Worstall
Tim Worstall, Contributor

David Cameron
, the UK Prime Minister, has a bright idea over how to deal with the menace of online porn. Just make the search engines not return a result for a list of banned words and phrases. As usual with a politician sparking the synapses this isn’t a very good idea, indeed it would be, as one writer puts it, applying a tourniquet to the First Amendment (not that the UK has one of those but you get the idea). For the problem is that language is pretty complex. It is indeed true that there are combinations of words that are used to describe certain sexual practices that we might not want the little children to see pictures of.
Well, actually, I’m not all that sure about that. I’m certain that being forced to perform in pornography is an absolutely vile thing for children to do. I agree entirely that children don’t have the capacity for consent as well. But I can’t find myself convinced that images of either grunting or groping are as dangerous to a budding psyche as the world in general seems to think. I do tend to think that humans are rather more robust that that. I’m not advocating that Two Women and a Cup replaces the bedtime story either but I am just generally unconvinced that there merest glimpse of naughty bits is going to either shock or harm children. Confuse a little perhaps, but then children are confused about many things. What harm would come from a three year old seeing a naked female torso? I suppose, dependent upon the age at which it was weaned, it might make it hungry but other than that I just can’t really see the problem.
But leave that aside and look at the actual details of what is being proposed. You put a search term into Google GOOG -0.26% and Cameron’s insistence is that if your term is naughty then Google should return no results. Which is something that Techcrunch have looked at. Apple AAPL +0.55% already has a version of this sort of filtering in Safari so they tried searching for a few things inside that. This is the list of things that they couldn’t gain access to:
BLOCKED: “Child Pornography Prevention Programs”
BLOCKED: “Rick Santorum”
BLOCKED: “Weiner Sex Scandal”
BLOCKED: “TechCrunch.com”
BLOCKED: “Dick Costolo” (CEO of Twitter)
BLOCKED: “Jefferson sex with slaves”
BLOCKED: “Tumblr’s porn problem”
BLOCKED: “Sexual reconstructive surgery”
BLOCKED: “How to tell my boyfriend I don’t want to have sex”
BLOCKED: “How to put on a condom”
BLOCKED: “Pussy Riot”
BLOCKED: “Adult Film Industry and expansion of broadband“
I think that second one is very funny indeed, for of course Santorum has done nothing at all, it’s the deliberate attempt by Dan Savage to lampoon him by associating the name with a particular sexual output that has led to that blocking. So is the first actually: trying to rid the internet of child porn could be said to be a noble goal: but if you at the same time block child access to what to do about it then you might be over reaching.
The basic problem is, as I say up top, that language is complex. We use words in combination, they can have varying meanings in themselves and the same phrases can be used in entirely different circumstances. Which means that to truly bock access to porn itself you’ve got to block just about anything and everything that could possibly be referring to something sexual. Which, for a mammalian species like us, where so much of what we do is ultimately about sex and the pursuit of it, means that to filter out the porn you’ve got to filter out most of the internet. Or, as they say:
The (very) savvy engineers at Apple have already discovered that you have to apply a tourniquet to the First Amendment to effectively block children from seeing naughty pictures.
It just doesn’t seem like a useful solution, does it
?

Friday, July 26, 2013

San Diego Mayor Bob Filner says he'll undergo intensive therapy

from latimes

Bob Filner's announcement appears to do little to quiet calls for his resignation amid allegations of sexual harassment.


Bob Filner says he'll undergo therapy

San Diego Mayor Bob Filner speaks during a news conference at City Hall at which he announced that will undergo two weeks of intensive therapy. His announcement did little to quiet calls for his resignation. (Gregory Bull / Associated Press / July 26, 2013)


SAN DIEGO — Mayor Bob Filner's announcement Friday that he will undergo two weeks of intensive therapy to improve his behavior toward women appeared to do little to quiet the calls for his resignation amid allegations of sexual harassment.
City Council President Todd Gloria, a fellow Democrat, said Filner's plan only "prolongs the pain he is inflicting on our city at a time when San Diegans are calling for an end to this civic nightmare."
Councilman Kevin Faulconer, the senior Republican on the council, said that Filner "needs to resign and seek long-term treatment as a private citizen."
The toughest denunciation came from Councilman Scott Sherman, a Republican: "San Diegans should accept nothing less than Bob Filner's resignation and/or arrest."
The leader of a possible recall movement said he will continue his efforts to oust Filner, after the mayor told a packed City Hall news conference that he plans to begin two weeks in an unnamed residential treatment program on Aug. 5.
The 70-year-old mayor said he will be briefed each morning and evening on city business and will return to City Hall on Aug. 19 ready to be "the best mayor I can be." Nothing in the statement suggested that Filner will relinquish any mayoral powers during the two weeks.
In his two-minute statement, Filner did not address the increasing demands that he resign. As in previous statements, he acknowledged treating women poorly but stopped short of admitting to sexual harassment. Soon after the first allegations were made, Filner said in a video: "I need help."
Seven women have publicly accused him of sexual misconduct, including Irene McCormack Jackson, his former communications director, who sued him and the city Monday.
"I must become a better person," Filner said, reading from a prepared statement. "And my hope is that by becoming a better person, I put myself in a position to someday be forgiven.
"However, before I can even think of asking for forgiveness, I need to demonstrate that my behavior has changed. And that will only happen over time and only if such incidents never, ever happen again."
Filner apologized for behavior toward women "over many years" that he called disrespectful and intimidating. In a strong, clear voice, Filner said his conduct has undermined his long political career spent "fighting for equality and justice for all people."
The city was served with a subpoena Friday requiring that Filner be deposed in Jackson's lawsuit.
Jackson alleges that Filner often grabbed her in a headlock, made sexually inappropriate comments and once asked her to work without panties.
Gloria Allred, the Los Angeles attorney representing Jackson, said Filner is using "therapy as a ploy to stay in power and to try to gain sympathy."
"It is ridiculous to think that he needs therapy in order to understand that women deserve respect and should not be treated like pieces of meat," Allred said.
Gloria, the council president, noted that the City Charter provides no guidance in the case of a mayor leaving City Hall to seek therapy. As such, he said, the issue "requires us to ask in the strongest terms possible for the mayor's resignation."
The City Charter also contains no provision for impeachment. Without a resignation, the only means for ousting a mayor are a recall election or conviction of a felony. The San Diego County Sheriff's Department has opened a hotline to field accusations against Filner, but there is no indication that a criminal investigation is underway.
The news conference was interrupted when the mayor's microphone went dead. Filner left the room, with reporters awaiting more details. Returning when the microphone problem was solved, Filner read his statement from the beginning.
Hearing of Filner's promise to enter a residential treatment facility, Francine Busby, chairwoman of the San Diego County Democratic Central Committee, called it "absolutely the first step he needs to take because he needs to get this help." But she doubted whether the public or Filner's alleged victims will think therapy is sufficient.
The committee voted Thursday night to call for Filner's resignation. A week earlier, when Filner's accusers had not yet gone public, the committee had declined to take such a step, saying more information was needed.
Elected in November, Filner is the city's first Democratic mayor in 20 years, elected on promises to improve neighborhood services and break up the "old boys' network" that he says has run City Hall for decades.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz, chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, on Friday morning called for Filner's resignation "for the good of the city of San Diego."
The latest women to accuse Filner of making unwanted sexual advances were a retired Navy admiral, a San Diego State University dean, a leader in the city's tourism industry, and the head of a group of business owners who are tenants of the San Diego Port District.
The encounters with Filner were at public events, the women said Thursday.
Though the sexual harassment allegations have received the most attention, Filner is also facing investigations by the City Council over a $100,000 donation by a land developer to two of his pet projects, and his use of public money for a trip last month to Paris to attend a rally staged by Iranian dissidents.
City Council members are investigating his use of a city credit card on the trip and whether it was necessary to send two San Diego police officers as a security detail.
Filner released cost figures for the trip Thursday night.
His expenses — $9,839 for airfare, lodging and meals — were paid by the Organization for Iranian-American Communities, a nonprofit group that supports greater democracy for Iran.
Filner was invited to speak at the annual rally of the National Council of Resistance of Iran. Other political figures, including former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, also attended. While a member ofCongress, Filner attended the annual rally on several occasions.
The San Diego Police Department paid for Filner's bodyguards to follow him: $21,244 for airfare, lodging and meals.
In a statement about the trip, Filner said that along with attending the Paris rally, he also went to the city of Lille to tour facilities involved with energy and sustainability programs.
"Building and maintaining these international relationships will support several of the mayor's most important priorities for San Diego," the statement said.
Filner's then-fiancee, Bronwyn Ingram, traveled with him, paying her own expenses.
According to Iranian.com, which posted a video from the event, Filner introduced Ingram as the "first lady of San Diego" and said that, in America and Iran, "it's the women who are going to set us free."
Days after the couple returned from Paris, Ingram broke off their engagement and ended their relationship. She sent an email to friends saying she had caught the mayor making dates with other women.

Thursday, July 25, 2013

One Girls 15 Minutes

from nydailynews


Woman who sexted Anthony Weiner says she loved him but is 'disgusted by him' now

Sydney Leathers shared the details of her months-long Internet fling with gossip media outlets. But, says an ex-friend, 'She is not the victim here … He is obviously weak and she has nothing to lose by this, but he does. They are both morons.'

Comments (51)
UPDATED: THURSDAY, JULY 25, 2013, 11:48 PM
30
17
0
Print
30
17
0

 POSSIBLE YOUNG WOMAN IN NEW ANTHONY WEINER TEXTING SCANDAL --DO NOT USE WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE PHOTO DESK OR A SENIOR EDITOR-- Sydney Elaine aka Sydney Leathers @sydneyelainexo Field Organizer for Obama for America/Student/Political News Junkie/Wanna-be Political Satirist/Progressive Stuck in a Conservative Hell

Sydney Leathers, the small-town Midwestern woman who had an explicit online relationship with Anthony Weiner for several months in 2012

Anthony Weiner’s virtual lover Sydney Leathers emerged Thursday to dish the dirt on the disgraced pol — and give the world a taste of the sexy cellphone shots that drove him wild.
The 23-year-old, who lives in the small town of Princeton, Ind., told all in interviews with gossip site TMZ and with TV program “Inside Edition.”
Sydney Leathers, 23, told TMZ she sent this photo and others to Anthony Weiner in July 2012, when they began an online relationship.

TMZ.COM

Sydney Leathers, 23, told TMZ she sent this photo and others to Anthony Weiner in July 2012, when they began an online relationship.

She said Weiner, 48, described himself at one point to her as “an argumentative, perpetually horny, middle-aged man.”
Yet, Leathers claimed she had deep feelings for Weiner — and that it was mutual. “I cared about him a lot. He was very important to me,” she told “Inside Edition.”
Photo of Sydney Leathers posted by TMZ Thursday. She said she sent this image to Anthony Weiner.

TMZ.COM

Photo of Sydney Leathers posted by TMZ Thursday. She said she sent this image to Anthony Weiner.

When asked if she told him that she loved him, she said, “Yes,” and claimed that he said the same to her.
But her feelings evaporated, she said, when she watched Weiner and his wife, Huma Abedin, at his news conference Tuesday in which the mayoral candidate addressed, once again, his online behavior.
“It literally disgusts me. It makes me feel physically ill,” she said. “I feel sick about it. I’m disgusted by him. He’s not who I thought he was.”
Leathers grew up in Mount Carmel, Ill.

Leathers grew up in Mount Carmel, Ill.

She said she felt he “manipulated” her — but that she regretted hurting his wife.
“I am extremely sorry for my part in the hurt and pain that she’s obviously feeling right now,” a sniffling Leathers said.
Another photo that 23-year-old Sydney Elaine Leathers said she sent to Anthony Weiner in July 2012.

TMZ.COM

Another photo that 23-year-old Sydney Elaine Leathers said she sent to Anthony Weiner in July 2012.

One former friend told the Daily News that Leathers was aware Weiner was married when they had their Internet fling, but didn’t care.
“She knew exactly what she was doing. Sydney plays victim best,” said the woman, who had a falling out with Leathers last year.
Sydney Leathers said she loved Anthony Weiner and that the disgraced pol professed his love for her

Sydney Leathers said she loved Anthony Weiner and that the disgraced pol professed his love for her

“She is not the victim here … He is obviously weak and she has nothing to lose by this, but he does. They are both morons.”
Several pals said that Leathers — who was once busted for marijuana possession — always craved the limelight.
She got her wish. She’s now being represented by Gina Rodriguez, the woman who manages “Tan Mom” Patricia Krentcil and once managed Nadya Suleman, better known as “Octomom.”
Anthony Weiner with his wife Huma Abedin (right), heading into a Manhattan fundraiser last month. His campaign for mayor has been rocked by new revelations of sexting.

NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

Anthony Weiner with his wife Huma Abedin (right), heading into a Manhattan fundraiser last month. His campaign for mayor has been rocked by new revelations of sexting.

Leathers said she carried on with Weiner for several months, beginning in July 2012 — more than a year after he resigned from Congress for having similar online relationships with about six other women.
Leathers said she sent Weiner pictures of her wearing high-heels because the former lawmaker gets excited by the way heels make a woman’s legs appear longer and more slender.
She said that sometime before April — as Weiner was preparing to run for mayor — he reached out to ask her to “erase any evidence of our conversations.”
“He was making campaign promises that … he learned from his mistakes,” Leathers said. “I am proof that this is not true.”


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/weiner-sexting-pal-tells-relationship-article-1.1409147#ixzz2a7oqelRI