Sunday, October 18, 2015

Behaviorism

from simplypsychology.org




Behaviorist Approach

by  twitter icon published, updated 2013
Behaviorism (also called the behaviorist approach) was the primary paradigm in psychology between 1920 to 1950 and is based on a number of underlying assumptions regarding methodology and behavioral analysis:
* Psychology should be seen as a science. Theories need to be supported by empirical data obtained through careful and controlled observation and measurement of behavior. Watson (1913) stated that “psychology as a behaviorist views it is a purely objective experimental branch of natural science. Its theoretical goal is … prediction and control” (p. 158).

* Behaviorism is primarily concerned with observable behavior, as opposed to internal events like thinking and emotion. Observable (i.e. external) behavior can be objectively and scientifically measured. Internal events, such as thinking should be explained through behavioral terms (or eliminated altogether).

* People have no free will – a person’s environment determines their behavior

* When born our mind is 'tabula rasa' (a blank slate).

* There is little difference between the learning that takes place in humans and that in other animals. Therefore, research can be carried out on animals as well as humans (i.e. comparative psychology.

* Behavior is the result of stimulus – response (i.e. all behavior, no matter how complex, can be reduced to a simple stimulus – response association). Watson described the purpose of psychology as: “To predict, given the stimulus, what reaction will take place; or, given the reaction, state what the situation or stimulus is that has caused the reaction” (1930, p. 11).

* All behavior is learnt from the environment. We learn new behavior through classical or operant conditioning. 

Varieties of Behaviorism

Historically, the most significant distinction between versions of behaviorism is that between Watson's original classical behaviorism, and forms of behaviorism later inspired by his work, known collectively as neobehaviorism.
In his book, Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It Watson (1913, p. 158) outlines the principles of all behaviorists:
Psychology as the behaviorist views it is a purely objective experimental branch of natural science. Its theoretical goal is the prediction and control of behavior. Introspection forms no essential part of its methods, nor is the scientific value of its data dependent upon the readiness with which they lend themselves to interpretation in terms of consciousness. The behaviorist, in his efforts to get a unitary scheme of animal response, recognizes no dividing line between man and brute. The behavior of man, with all of its refinement and complexity, forms only a part of the behaviorist's total scheme of investigation.

The History of Behaviorism

Pavlov (1897) published the results of an experiment on conditioning after originally studying digestion in dogs.
* Watson (1913) launches the behavioral school of psychology (classical conditioning), publishing an article, "Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It".
Watson and Rayner (1920) conditioned an orphan called Albert B (aka Little Albert) to fear a white rat.
Thorndike (1905) formalized the "Law of Effect".
Skinner (1936) wrote "The Behavior of Organisms" and introduced the concepts of operant conditioning and shaping.
* Clark Hull’s (1943) Principles of Behavior was published.
* B.F. Skinner (1948) published Walden Two, in which he described a utopian society founded upon behaviorist principles.
Bandura (1963) publishes a book called the "Social Leaning Theory and Personality development" which combines both cognitive and behavioral frameworks.
* Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (begun in 1958).
* B.F. Skinner (1971) published his book, Beyond Freedom and Dignity, where he argues that free will is an illusion.

Behaviorism Summary

Key FeaturesMethodology
Basic AssumptionsAreas of Application
  • Psychology should be seen as a science, to be studied in a scientific manner.
  • Behaviorism is primarily concerned with observable behavior, as opposed to internal events like thinking.
  • Behavior is the result of stimulus – response (i.e. all behavior, no matter how complex, can be reduced to a simple stimulus – response features).
  • Behavior is determined by the environment (e.g. conditioning).
StrengthsLimitations
  • Scientific
  • Highly applicable (e.g. therapy)
  • Emphasizes objective measurement
  • Many experiments to support theories
  • Identified comparisons between animals (Pavlov) and humans (Watson & Rayner - Little Albert)
  • Ignores mediational processes
  • Ignores biology (e.g. testosterone)
  • Too deterministic (little free-will)
  • Experiments – low ecological validity
  • Humanism – can’t compare animals to humans
  • Reductionist

Critical Evaluation

An obvious advantage of behaviorism is its ability to clearly define behavior and to measure changes in behavior. According to the law of parsimony, the fewer assumptions a theory makes, the better and the more credible it is. Behaviorism, therefore, looks for simple explanations of human behavior from a very scientific standpoint.
However, Humanism (e.g. Carl Rogers) rejects the scientific method of using experiments to measure and control variables because it creates an artificial environment and has low ecological validity.
Humanistic psychology also assumes that humans have free will (personal agency) to make their own decisions in life and do not follow the deterministic laws of science.
Humanism also rejects the nomothetic approach of behaviorism as they view humans as being unique and believe humans cannot be compared with animals (who aren’t susceptible to demand characteristics). This is known as an idiographic approach.
The psychodynamic approach (Freud) criticizes behaviorism as it does not take into account the unconscious mind’s influence on behavior, and instead focuses on externally observable behavior. Freud also rejects that idea that people are born a blank slate (tabula rasa) and states that people are born with instincts (e.g. eros and thanatos).
Biological psychology states that all behavior has a physical / organic cause. They emphasize the role of nature over nurture. For example, chromosomes and hormones (testosterone) influence our behavior too, in addition to the environment.
Cognitive psychology states that mediational processes occur between stimulus and response, such asmemory, thinking, problem solving etc.
Despite these criticisms behaviorism has made significant contributions to psychology. These include insights into learning, language development, and moral and gender development, which have all been explained in terms of conditioning.
The contribution of behaviorism can be seen in some of its practical applications. Behavior therapy andbehavior modification represent one of the major approaches to the treatment of abnormal behavior and are readily used in clinical psychology.

References

Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Pavlov, I. P. (1897). The work of the digestive glands. London: Griffin.
Skinner, B. F. (1948). Walden two. New York: Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.
Thorndike, E. L. (1905). The elements of psychology. New York: A. G. Seiler.
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158-178.
Watson, J. B. (1930). Behaviorism (revised edition). University of Chicago Press.
Watson, J. B., & Rayner, R. (1920). Conditioned emotional reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 1, pp. 1–14.

How to cite this article:

McLeod, S. A. (2013). Behaviorist Approach. Retrieved from www.simplypsychology.org/behaviorism.html

Like The Site? Follow Us!

Comments (20)

+20
Ashkan's avatar
Ashkan· 160 weeks ago
I'm working on a project about psychology of text and behaviorism and this article is really good. Thanks. I will definitely have this article in the list of my references.
1 reply · active 75 weeks ago
+15
Zakumi's avatar
Zakumi· 156 weeks ago
Doing an assignment at the moment about developement, cant seem to understand this subject much.. This cleared up alot for me :) Thanks Saul
+8
Amit's avatar
Amit· 144 weeks ago
Excellent source of valuable information for someone who is new to the subject.
+3
Kathryn's avatar
Kathryn· 139 weeks ago
Thanks so much Psychology is a FANTASTIC subject.... thanks to the authors of this website :D 
P.s HAPPY VALENTINES DAY
+1
Trip's avatar
Trip· 129 weeks ago
Seems like most people including the writer of this article don't understand behaviorism completely. The animal tests were examples, and the environment programs peoples chemical responses. Modern behaviorist take into account that people aren't born as blank slates but what they are is based on environmental conditioning of the parents and the fetus' genetic information. It's not all direct stimulus response but also chemical response. We are all environment, our 'Free will' is programmed by events in our past and ideas adopted from other people in the environment, and how our chemical biology responds to stimulus. Looks like most psychologists over-simplify behaviorist theory so people can continue to think free will exists, it doesn't, it's just a complicated program due to the social and chemical stimulus in your environment.
2 replies · active 5 weeks ago
0
Boris's avatar
Boris· 118 weeks ago
I must again mention the misconceptions about B.F. Skinners work and widely promoted opinion about his view on genetically preretirement human behaivor. Concretely the “Tabula Rasa” approach. 
Many academics and scientist in different fields for example biology and psychology and of course many scientific papers and scholars are teaching misconceptions about B.F.Skinner and Behaviorism. 
These misconceptions are: that the organism is a Tabula Rasa and that Behaviorism and B.F. Skinner refuse genetically preretirement behaviour in terms of the evolution of the species. 
One of the main characteristic and principles on which the Beahviorism is based is the selective action of that environment during the evolution of the species. 
The other misconception widely used when talking about Behaviorism is that it refuses the existence of mental processes. The Behaviorism only considers these processes as by-products of environmental causation and as empirically not proven.
-7
harry's avatar
harry· 108 weeks ago
guys what is the difference between someone with a superego and ego
+5
Sam's avatar
Behaviourism does not reduce behaviour to S-R associations! That is only the case of a minor part of a person's repertoire and is the essence of Classical Conditioning. To explain the majority of an organism's (including humans) behaviour, we need to consider the consequences of behaviour, a key aspect of Operant Conditioning.
+2
June's avatar
June· 104 weeks ago
This is great! Working on a HUGE paper on the development of behaviorism and this was very helpful. Will definitely be citing this source in my paper. Thanks!




Sunday, August 30, 2015

Buying Sex Should Not Be Legal

from nytimes opinion

The Opinion Pages | OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR


Photo
CreditLauren Nassef
DUBLIN — HERE in my city, earlier this month, Amnesty International’s international council endorsed a new policy calling for the decriminalization of the global sex trade. Its proponents argue that decriminalizing prostitution is the best way of protecting “the human rights of sex workers,” though the policy would apply equally to pimps, brothel-keepers and johns.
Amnesty’s stated aim is to remove the stigma from prostituted women, so that they will be less vulnerable to abuse by criminals operating in the shadows. The group is also calling on governments “to ensure that sex workers enjoy full and equal legal protection from exploitation, trafficking and violence.”
The Amnesty vote comes in the context of a prolonged international debate about how to deal with prostitution and protect the interests of so-called sex workers. It is a debate in which I have a personal stake — and I believe Amnesty is making a historic mistake.
I entered the sex trade — as most do — before I was even a woman. At age 14, I was placed in the care of the state after my father committed suicide and because my mother suffered from mental illness.
Within a year, I was on the streets with no home, education or job skills. All I had was my body. At 15, I met a young man who thought it would be a good idea for me to prostitute myself. As “fresh meat,” I was a commodity in high demand.
For seven years, I was bought and sold. On the streets, that could be 10 times in a night. It’s hard to describe the full effect of the psychological coercion, and how deeply it eroded my confidence. By my late teens, I was using cocaine to dull the pain.
I cringe when I hear the words “sex work.” Selling my body wasn’t a livelihood. There was no resemblance to ordinary employment in the ritual degradation of strangers’ using my body to satiate their urges. I was doubly exploited — by those who pimped me and those who bought me.
I know there are some advocates who argue that women in prostitution sell sex as consenting adults. But those who do are a relatively privileged minority — primarily white, middle-class, Western women in escort agencies — not remotely representative of the global majority. Their right to sell doesn’t trump my right and others’ not to be sold in a trade that preys on women already marginalized by class and race.
The effort to decriminalize the sex trade worldwide is not a progressive movement. Implementing this policy will simply calcify into law men’s entitlement to buy sex, while decriminalizing pimping will protect no one but the pimps.
In the United States, prostitution is thought to be worth at least $14 billiona year. Most of that money doesn’t go to girls like my teenage self. Worldwide, human trafficking is the second largest enterprise of organized crime, behind drug cartels but on a par with gunrunning.
In countries that have decriminalized the sex trade, legal has attracted illegal. With popular support, the authorities in Amsterdam have closed down much of the city’s famous red light district — because it had become a magnet for criminal activity.
In Germany, where prostitution was legalized in 2002, the industry has exploded. It is estimated that one million men pay to use 450,000 girls and women every day. Sex tourists are pouring in, supporting “mega-brothels” up to 12 stories high.
In New Zealand, where prostitution was decriminalized in 2003, young women in brothels have told me that men now demand more than ever for less than ever. And because the trade is socially sanctioned, there is no incentive for the government to provide exit strategies for those who want to get out of it. These women are trapped.
There is an alternative: an approach, which originated in Sweden, that has now been adopted by other countries such as Norway, Iceland and Canada and is sometimes called the “Nordic model.”
The concept is simple: Make selling sex legal but buying it illegal — so that women can get help without being arrested, harassed or worse, and the criminal law is used to deter the buyers, because they fuel the market. There are numerous techniques, including hotel sting operations, placing fake ads to inhibit johns, and mailing court summonses to home addresses, where accused men’s spouses can see them.
Since Sweden passed its law, the number of men who say they have bought sex has plummeted. (At 7.5 percent, it’s roughly half the rate reported by American men.) In contrast, after neighboring Denmark decriminalized prostitution outright, the trade increased by 40 percent within a seven-year period.
Contrary to stereotype, the average john is not a loner or a loser. In America, a significant proportion of buyers who purchase sex frequentlyhave an annual income above $120,000 and are married. Most have college degrees, and many have children. Why not let fines from these privileged men pay for young women’s counseling, education and housing? It is they who have credit cards and choices, not the prostituted women and girls.
Amnesty International proposes a sex trade free from “force, fraud or coercion,” but I know from what I’ve lived and witnessed that prostitution cannot be disentangled from coercion. I believe the majority of Amnesty delegates who voted in Dublin wished to help women and girls in prostitution and mistakenly allowed themselves to be sold the notion that decriminalizing pimps and johns would somehow achieve that aim. But in the name of human rights, what they voted for was to decriminalizeviolations of those rights, on a global scale.
The recommendation goes before the board for a final decision this autumn. Many of Amnesty’s leaders and members realize that their organization’s credibility and integrity are on the line. It’s not too late to stop this disastrous policy before it harms women and children worldwide.

Wednesday, August 19, 2015

St. Paul's School Rape Trial: Accuser Tells Court 'I Felt Like I Couldn't Say No'

from NBC


by 






A 16-year-old girl who says she was raped at a prestigious New Hampshire prep school returned to the witness stand on Wednesday, describing a secret date with an older boy that turned suddenly aggressive.
The girl described her confusion as he groped her in secluded room of a campus building at St. Pail's School in Concord, New Hampshire. "I felt like I was frozen," she said through tears as she described the accused, Owen Labrie, kissing and biting her and trying to pull down her underwear.
As the groping continued, she said, "I felt like I had no control. I felt like I couldn't say no."
At one point, the girl said, she did say no. But as the alleged attack continued, she said she tried to zone out, looking at the ceiling and trying to ignore the pain.
"I didn't want to believe that this was happening to me," the girl said under questioning from Deputy Merrimack County Attorney Catherine Ruffle.
The girl was picking up where she left off Tuesday, when she began her testimony, recounting that the encounter at the school was set in motion by a surprise email invitation from Labrie. She said she took the date request to be part of a campus tradition called "senior salute," in which seniors pursued younger students in the days before graduation.
The girl, a freshman at the time, declined — but she says she was persuaded by a mutual friend to reconsider. She and Labrie met on May 30 at the Lindsay Center for Mathematics and Science.
She recalled on the stand realizing that Labrie was having sexual intercourse with her. She acknowledged that she did not protest or try to get him off of her. "I felt like I had objected as much as I felt I could at the time," she said. "Other than that, I felt powerless and weak that I couldn't do anything else."
Labrie, 19, has told police he did not have intercourse with her, and that their encounter was consensual. He will take the stand later in the trial.
His defense lawyer, Jay Carney, is expected to cross-examine the girl after she finishes answering the prosecutor's questions. Carney has said he will also present email and Facebook messages between the girl and Labrie that proves she was a willing participant.
The "senior salute" is expected to play a significant role in the trial, with prosecutors arguing that it was the basis for Labrie's alleged luring of the girl, and defense lawyers saying it helped to show the encounter was consensual.
Labrie, a housing dorm prefect who said he planned to become a minister, is charged with three counts of aggravated felony sex assault, four counts of misdemeanor sex assault, endangering the welfare of a child and using a computer to lure her to meet him via email and Facebook.
He has told police that he never had sexual intercourse with her — after putting on a condom, he experienced a "moment of divine inspiration" and stopped himself from going any farther.
 Representative of rape accuser's family: People are 'choosing sides' 3:35

Tuesday, August 18, 2015

Prep School Rape Trial Opens With Email Between Victim and Alleged Attacker

from abc

Aug 18, 2015, 10:51 AM ET
By SUSANNA KIM and MICHELE McPHEE
SUSANNA KIM More From Susanna »
Business Digital Reporter


 via GOOD MORNING AMERICA





Sexual Assault Case Raises Questions About Culture at NH Prep School
AUTO START: ON OFF
Opening arguments and testimony begin today for a rape case involving an elite New Hampshire prep school that has raised questions about the campus culture.
The defendant, Owen Labrie, 19, of Tunbridge, Vermont, is a graduate of St. Paul's School in Concord, New Hampshire. He is accused of raping a 15-year old girl on campus on May 30, 2014, days before he graduated.
Labrie's attorney, Boston defense attorney J.W. Carney, displayed enlarged printouts of email exchanged between Labrie and the alleged victim before that time, including what he called "romantic" language in French.

“Neither of us were there. None of you were there. What we have to focus on is the evidence,” Carney told the jury today, asking them to zero in on the alleged victim's words about whether she was a "willing participant."
He read to the jury a text message conversation that allegedly took place after May 30 in which the alleged victim asked Labrie if he wore a condom and he asks if she was using "the pill," and the two text "haha" several times.
Labrie has pleaded not guilty to multiple felony accounts and says he did not have sexual intercourse with the student.
Wearing a dark gray blazer and white, button-down shirt, Labrie walked into the courtroom this morning as his eyes swept the packed benches taking in former classmates, family members and national media.
His parents sat in the front row on opposite ends of the bench. They are divorced, according to records.
Officials were forced to set up a standing-room-only section in the back of courthouse.
Labrie stood when the judge read the 10-count indictment: four felonies and six misdemeanors, including three counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault, as well as using a computer on-line service to seduce, lure or entice a child younger than 16.
Merrimack County Superior Court Justice Larry M. Smukler instructed the jurors to “evaluate each charge independently” before prosecutors began opening arguments.
PHOTO: Owen Labrie, seen here in an undated booking photo, has been charged with the rape of a young student on the Concord, N.H. campus of the prestigious St. Pauls School in May, 2015.
Concord New Hampshire Police
PHOTO: Owen Labrie, seen here in an undated booking photo, has been charged with the rape of a young student on the Concord, N.H. campus of the prestigious St. Paul's School in May, 2015.
The alleged victim's name has not been released because of her age and the nature of the crime.
Jury selection Monday included three women and 11 men.
Labrie was interviewed by Concord police, who said he spoke willingly about an alleged practice at the Episcopal school called a "senior salute," according to the Associated Press. He claims it involved senior boys attempting to "score" with younger female students, taking their virginity, before the boys graduated. Deputy Merrimack County Attorney Catherine Ruffle Monday said the alleged practice is "the context for this entire event," according to the Associated Press.
“He thought about this for months,” Ruffle told the jury today. “He made a plan. And he executed the plan.”
Prosecutors say that Labrie called his sexual conquests "slays" and the only person whose name was capitalized in a list was the 15-year old freshman.
Carney downplayed the sexual nature of the "senior salute" and argued that it was a tradition that's "decades" old and focused on kissing another student and not sexual intercourse.
The school, whose alumni include Secretary of State John Kerry and former FBI Director Robert Mueller, said in a statement Monday that the allegations about the school's culture are "not proven facts, and the judicial system will weigh them and determine how this case is ultimately resolved."